真高興又看到你。
記得以前我們討論真理是局限的，今天我在休謨那裡看到了關於對induction的反駁。很又意味。
Hume thus concludes that our inductive practices have no rational foundation, for no form of reason will certify it. However, there are many points to note about what Hume is definitely not saying. He is not saying that induction is not deduction, and thus not rational (i.e. he is not a "deductivist"). For in the Treatise, in a section entitled Of Scepticism with regard to Reason, he argues that if unaided reason determined our beliefs, if belief-formation were rational all the way down, then we would never believe anything, including intuitive or deductive truths.
如果理性没有任何的依据就能构成我们的思想、如果思想是从头到尾都是由理性所构成的，那么我们根本不可能会相信任何东西，包括了知觉或演绎得出的任何真相在内.
這話說的似乎都看不懂了。。。
